H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Vladimir Zednik vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 1-2
Nikola Pilic holds a 2–1 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1978 Brussels third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1978* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 6-3 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1975* | Aviles | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nikola Pilic | 3-6 7-6 6-3 7-6 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1970* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vladimir Zednik | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |