H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
W. Fibak vs T. Okker H2H: 3-2
W. Fibak holds a 3–2 lead over T. Okker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, W. Fibak won the 1978 Boston third round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1978* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | W. Fibak | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | T. Okker | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1977* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | W. Fibak | 6-2 6-2 | T. Okker | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1976* | Stockholm - Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | W. Fibak | 6-4 7-5 | T. Okker | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1976* | Rotterdam Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | T. Okker | 6-1 6-4 | W. Fibak | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1975* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | T. Okker | 7-5 7-5 | W. Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| W. Fibak | T. Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |