H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wally Masur vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-3
Cedric Pioline holds a 3–0 lead over Wally Masur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1994 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1994* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Wally Masur | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-1 6-7(3) 7-6(2) 6-1 | Wally Masur | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-7(4) 8-6 | Wally Masur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wally Masur | #1,268 | #15 | 1,417 | 1,898 | 312 | 266 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wally Masur | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #423 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #423 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #287 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #67 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #35 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #56 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,791 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1994 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #137 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |