H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wally Masur vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-1
Wally Masur holds a 4–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Wally Masur leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wally Masur won the 1992 New Haven second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1992* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Wally Masur | 6-3 6-0 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1992* | Manchester | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Wally Masur | 6-3 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1991* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Wally Masur | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1991* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Wally Masur | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1987* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wally Masur | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wally Masur | #1,268 | #15 | 1,417 | 1,898 | 312 | 266 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wally Masur | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #423 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #423 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #287 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #67 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #35 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #56 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,791 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1994 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #137 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |