H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Wally Masur vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 2-0
Wally Masur holds a 2–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wally Masur leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wally Masur won the 1992 Miami Masters first round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Wally Masur | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1987* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Wally Masur | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wally Masur | #1,268 | #15 | 1,417 | 1,898 | 312 | 266 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wally Masur | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #423 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #423 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #287 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #67 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #35 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #56 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1992 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1993 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,791 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1994 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #137 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |