H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wally Masur vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-3
Paul Annacone holds a 3–0 lead over Wally Masur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1987 Wimbledon second round 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Wally Masur | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1986* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Wally Masur | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1985* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 4-6 6-3 7-6 | Wally Masur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wally Masur | #1,268 | #15 | 1,417 | 1,898 | 312 | 266 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wally Masur | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #423 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #423 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #287 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #67 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #35 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #56 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1993 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,791 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1994 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #137 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |