H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Andre Sa H2H: 1-0
Wayne Arthurs holds a 1–0 lead over Andre Sa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2002 San Jose fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2002* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Andre Sa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andre Sa | #996 | #55 | 684 | 1,708 | 48 | 88 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Andre Sa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #169 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #127 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #106 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #209 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |