H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 2-0
Wayne Arthurs holds a 2–0 lead over Arvind Parmar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2002 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2006 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Wayne Arthurs | 2-6 7-6(3) 10-8 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2002* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Wayne Arthurs | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1999* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Wayne Arthurs | 7-5 6-2 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |