H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-2
Justin Gimelstob holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2006 Newport fourth round 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2006* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Justin Gimelstob | 6-3 7-6(1) | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2005* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(6) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1999* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-4 6-1 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |