H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Wayne Arthurs vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-2

Justin Gimelstob holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2006 Newport round of 16 6-3 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justin Gimelstob #111 6-3 7-6(1) Wayne Arthurs #198 Match data Jul 14, 2006* R16 Newport ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Wayne Arthurs #99 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(6) Justin Gimelstob #149 Match data Feb 25, 2005* R16 Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Justin Gimelstob #91 6-4 6-1 Wayne Arthurs #95 Match data Aug 19, 1999* R32 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Arthurs Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wayne Arthurs Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wayne Arthurs Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wayne Arthurs Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.60
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.12
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.32
25 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.70
27 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.05
29 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.54
30 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.