H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Peter Luczak H2H: 1-0
Wayne Arthurs holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Luczak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Arthurs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2003 Shanghai third round 5-7 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Wayne Arthurs | 7-6(11) 6-2 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2003* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Luczak | #1,007 | #64 | 775 | 1,685 | 37 | 80 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Peter Luczak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #166 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #77 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #137 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |