H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Wayne Arthurs vs Robert Kendrick H2H: 0-1
Robert Kendrick holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robert Kendrick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robert Kendrick won the 2003 Tokyo second round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2003* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Robert Kendrick | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Arthurs | Robert Kendrick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |