H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Wayne Arthurs vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-1

Wayne Arthurs holds a 3–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 3–0 on grass, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2002 Nottingham third round 7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2002* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Wayne Arthurs #113 7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-2 Sargis Sargsian #74 Match data
Jun 13, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Wayne Arthurs #126 6-2 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #72 Match data
Jun 21, 2001* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Wayne Arthurs #48 6-3 3-6 7-5 Sargis Sargsian #123 Match data
Mar 2, 2001* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Sargis Sargsian #105 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(2) Wayne Arthurs #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 122 152 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Arthurs Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,638 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,700 0 0 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2004 12–19 38.7% #101 1,567 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,668 0 1 — — — — — — —