H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Wayne Arthurs vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-1

Wayne Arthurs holds a 3–1 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 3–0 on grass, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2002 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wayne Arthurs #113 7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-2 Sargis Sargsian #74 Match data Jun 20, 2002* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Wayne Arthurs #126 6-2 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #72 Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Wayne Arthurs #48 6-3 3-6 7-5 Sargis Sargsian #123 Match data Jun 21, 2001* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Sargis Sargsian #105 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(2) Wayne Arthurs #71 Match data Mar 2, 2001* R16 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Arthurs Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wayne Arthurs Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wayne Arthurs Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2% 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6% 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0% 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5% 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2% 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
34 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wayne Arthurs Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.39
25 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.49
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70
27 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.47
28 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
29 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.86
30 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.63
31 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.22
32 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
34 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.