H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Wayne Arthurs vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 2-0

Wayne Arthurs holds a 2–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Arthurs won the 2005 Japan Open round of 64 6-3 1-6 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wayne Arthurs #97 6-3 1-6 7-6(2) Takao Suzuki #218 Match data Oct 5, 2005* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #118 6-1 6-2 Takao Suzuki #212 Match data Sep 26, 2003* R16 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Arthurs Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0
33 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wayne Arthurs Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wayne Arthurs Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
33 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wayne Arthurs Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.13
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.05
30 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.