H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wayne Black vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 2-0
Wayne Black holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Black leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Black won the 1996 Tokyo second round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1996* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Wayne Black | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1994* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Black | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Black | #1,469 | #69 | 646 | 1,721 | 52 | 81 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Black | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #719 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #360 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #194 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #151 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #302 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |