H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Albert Costa H2H: 5-2

Wayne Ferreira holds a 5–2 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2002 US Open second round 1-6 6-7(10) 6-4 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Albert Costa
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Wayne Ferreira #39 1-6 6-7(10) 6-4 7-5 6-4 Albert Costa #8 Match data
Aug 8, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #44 7-6(6) 6-2 Albert Costa #7 Match data
Jan 23, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #59 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-7(4) 9-7 Albert Costa #40 Match data
May 12, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Wayne Ferreira #24 3-6 6-2 7-6(4) Albert Costa #20 Match data
Jun 26, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Wayne Ferreira #27 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-3 Albert Costa #13 Match data
May 9, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Albert Costa #26 6-3 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #32 Match data
Jan 22, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Albert Costa #13 6-3 6-2 3-2 (ret.) Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 — — — — — — —