H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-2
Andy Roddick holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2002 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| May 11, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |