H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-0
Wayne Ferreira holds a 2–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2002 Scottsdale third round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2000* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |