H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-2

Wayne Ferreira holds a 4–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1998 Lyon fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Wayne Ferreira #29 7-6(3) 6-2 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Jun 29, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Cedric Pioline #44 6-4 6-3 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #22 Match data
May 17, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Wayne Ferreira #6 6-4 6-1 Cedric Pioline #53 Match data
Nov 3, 1994* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #43 6-4 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #12 Match data
Feb 11, 1993* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Wayne Ferreira #15 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #33 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Wayne Ferreira #71 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 2-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5