H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs David Prinosil H2H: 3-0
Wayne Ferreira holds a 3–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 7-6(6) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Wayne Ferreira | 7-6(6) 6-3 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1995* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Wayne Ferreira | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| May 20, 1993* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Wayne Ferreira | 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |