H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0

Wayne Ferreira holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1994 Nice round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wayne Ferreira #21 6-2 6-4 David Rikl #59 Match data Apr 15, 1994* R16 Nice ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Wayne Ferreira #18 6-3 6-4 6-2 David Rikl #59 Match data Jan 21, 1994* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,024 487 317 60.6% 0 2 0 1 12 15
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,528 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,713 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1992 49–25 66.2% #12 1,843 0 2 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,820 0 2 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,925 0 7 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,929 0 11 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1996 48–25 65.8% #10 1,841 0 13 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,815 0 13 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,824 0 13 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,705 0 13 — — — — — — —
28 2000 41–22 65.1% #13 1,883 0 14 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,705 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,760 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,691 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wayne Ferreira David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1992 25 11 36 69.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 24 11 35 68.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 41 10 51 80.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1995 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 17 5 22 77.3% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1996 31 12 43 72.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1997 16 10 26 61.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 17 14 31 54.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1999 15 14 29 51.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 30 12 42 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2001 7 11 18 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 15 11 26 57.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 12 29 58.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283 168 451 62.7% 86 63 149 57.7% 65 32 97 67.0% 53 54 107 49.5% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 697/797 of Wayne Ferreira's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wayne Ferreira David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 40/47 4.4 2.7 56.9% 70.6% 50.3% 49.1% 46.8% 62.1% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 63/74 6.7 3.0 55.1% 73.9% 50.7% 62.5% 44.0% 63.3% 39.6% 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 1993 54/63 6.6 2.8 56.2% 73.1% 49.7% 56.2% 44.8% 62.8% 39.0% 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 1994 83/91 7.3 2.4 56.3% 73.6% 52.6% 62.2% 46.1% 64.5% 40.6% 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 1995 73/80 6.7 2.7 56.0% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 42.0% 63.2% 40.6% 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 1996 62/73 7.6 2.9 55.2% 75.6% 49.1% 57.1% 42.2% 63.8% 38.6% 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 1997 41/48 6.4 3.3 52.4% 74.1% 50.1% 55.5% 44.1% 62.6% 38.7% 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 1998 49/57 6.2 3.2 53.7% 74.4% 49.8% 56.5% 37.8% 63.0% 37.1% 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1999 44/52 7.8 3.6 53.7% 76.2% 49.5% 56.4% 35.5% 64.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 52/63 8.1 3.0 54.4% 75.4% 52.5% 60.7% 43.7% 65.0% 38.1% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 2001 36/37 7.4 2.9 53.3% 73.7% 48.7% 50.4% 37.7% 61.9% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 32/42 9.7 3.1 53.7% 75.5% 51.8% 59.0% 45.9% 64.5% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 41/43 7.4 2.5 57.6% 73.3% 52.0% 64.5% 34.5% 64.1% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 27/27 6.5 2.7 57.0% 69.6% 53.5% 55.7% 37.2% 62.8% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 697/804 7.0 2.9 55.2% 74.0% 50.6% 58.1% 42.1% 63.5% 38.3% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wayne Ferreira David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1529 106.7 — — — — +4 — +43 38.9% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.74 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 1991 1713 140.8 +1.01 +0.76 1.045 50.5% -8 -109 -124 55.6% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.33 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1992 1844 150.1 +1.86 +1.37 1.079 51.4% -40 -90 -30 61.6% +0.56 13–9 (59%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.33 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1993 1820 147.3 +1.45 +1.28 1.048 50.7% -7 -110 +62 55.4% +0.25 13–5 (72%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.39 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1994 1926 153.9 +2.71 +3.14 1.146 52.6% +12 -174 +31 66.1% +0.98 25–11 (69%) 17–18 (49%) — -1.12 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1995 1929 153.8 +1.35 +2.81 1.104 51.9% +1 -10 -46 62.0% +0.71 20–9 (69%) 15–19 (44%) — +2.01 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1996 1841 151.0 +2.07 +1.61 1.069 51.2% -5 +101 +71 59.2% +0.49 18–8 (69%) 15–14 (52%) — +0.39 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1997 1815 140.4 +0.88 +0.38 1.034 50.5% +13 +52 +82 53.0% +0.26 12–8 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.69 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1998 1824 152.8 +1.42 +0.81 1.003 49.7% -7 +48 +89 55.9% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 10–11 (48%) — -4.20 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1999 1705 139.5 +1.33 -1.08 0.989 49.8% +25 +131 +113 50.7% -0.06 12–10 (55%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1883 148.6 +2.46 +1.75 1.087 51.3% +7 -57 -24 58.0% +0.45 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.27 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 2001 1705 132.4 +0.45 -1.42 0.944 48.8% +43 +43 +100 48.4% -0.29 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1811 141.0 +1.54 -1.23 0.985 50.2% -10 -94 +18 55.9% +0.37 11–6 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1761 144.9 +1.68 +0.18 1.020 50.4% +10 +2 — 55.1% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1692 120.9 +0.36 -2.47 0.899 48.1% -21 — +102 46.5% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2024 151.9 +1.61 +1.00 1.049 50.8% 0 -17 +31 57.2% +0.38 169–103 (62%) 169–167 (50%) 103.3 -0.37 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.