H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Guy Forget H2H: 3-0
Wayne Ferreira holds a 3–0 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1996 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Wayne Ferreira | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1994* | Basel | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1994* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Guy Forget | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 |