H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-2
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1994 Sun City fourth round 7-6(4) 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1994* | Sun City | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1994* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wayne Ferreira | 6-4 7-6(5) | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1992* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |