H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Jim Grabb H2H: 2-0
Wayne Ferreira holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1994 Indianapolis third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1994 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-1 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1994* | Oahu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |