H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-2
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2003 Stockholm third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2003* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-4 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2003* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-4 1-6 7-6(1) | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |