H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2004 US Open first round 6-1 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-1 7-5 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #107 Match data
Aug 3, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Wayne Ferreira #25 6-3 4-6 7-5 Lleyton Hewitt #5 Match data
Mar 7, 2003* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 6-1 Wayne Ferreira #32 Match data
Oct 21, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #3 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #36 Match data
Nov 6, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Wayne Ferreira #11 7-6(6) 3-6 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-2 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30