H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 5-0

Wayne Ferreira holds a 5–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1999 Canada Masters second round 6-3 5-7 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 1999* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Wayne Ferreira #36 6-3 5-7 7-6(6) Mark Woodforde #75 Match data
Jul 2, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Wayne Ferreira #8 6-1 1-6 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 Mark Woodforde #31 Match data
Feb 4, 1994* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #18 6-2 7-5 Mark Woodforde #29 Match data
Jan 19, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #46 4-6 6-3 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #87 Match data
May 16, 1991* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Wayne Ferreira #85 7-6(2) 6-4 Mark Woodforde #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4