H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 0-3
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 3–0 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2003 Miami Masters third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-4 6-2 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 5-7 6-3 7-5 6-3 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 7-6(4) 2-6 7-5 | Wayne Ferreira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |