H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 4-3

Wayne Ferreira holds a 4–3 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2000 Canada Masters fourth round 7-5 7-6(4).

RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #31 7-5 7-6(4) Richard Krajicek #24 Match data
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Wayne Ferreira #37 5-7 6-3 6-3 7-6(3) Richard Krajicek #27 Match data
Jan 24, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #26 6-7(1) 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 6-3 Richard Krajicek #9 Match data
Jul 1, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Richard Krajicek #14 6-3 6-3 7-5 Wayne Ferreira #27 Match data
May 19, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Richard Krajicek #25 6-3 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #11 Match data
May 11, 1996* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Wayne Ferreira #10 6-4 6-3 Richard Krajicek #26 Match data
Feb 24, 1995* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #16 6-3 7-6(0) Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15