H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-2

Sargis Sargsian holds a 2–1 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2003 Australian Open fourth round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #39 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #94 Match data
May 28, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Sargis Sargsian #75 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 7-6(5) Wayne Ferreira #24 Match data
Jul 30, 1998* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Sargis Sargsian #88 6-1 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1