H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 4-0

Wayne Ferreira holds a 4–0 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2000 Canada Masters third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #31 6-4 6-3 Thomas Johansson #44 Match data
Jan 21, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Wayne Ferreira #53 6-3 6-2 6-7(2) 4-6 6-2 Thomas Johansson #42 Match data
Apr 17, 1999* Tokyo ATP 250 SF Hard Wayne Ferreira #28 6-3 6-2 Thomas Johansson #20 Match data
Apr 18, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 5-7 6-3 6-3 Thomas Johansson #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 — — — — — — —
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 — — — — — — — 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9