H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Wayne Ferreira vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–2 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Wimbledon third round 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(8) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tim Henman #5 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(8) 6-1 Wayne Ferreira #51 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #8 6-4 6-0 Wayne Ferreira #35 Match data
Jun 16, 2001* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Tim Henman #11 5-7 6-4 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #16 Match data
Nov 13, 1998* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #10 7-6(3) 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #27 Match data
Aug 29, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Wayne Ferreira #55 6-3 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #21 Match data
Oct 19, 1996* Ostrava ATP 250 QF Carpet Tim Henman #26 6-4 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #7 Match data
Aug 24, 1996* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Ferreira Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11