H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Wayne Ferreira vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0
Wayne Ferreira holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2003 Scottsdale third round 7-5 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Ferreira | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Wayne Ferreira | 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(5) 6-1 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Ferreira | #1,099 | #6 | 2,701 | 2,022 | 483 | 314 | 60.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Ferreira | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 55–25 | 68.8% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #10 | 1,838 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,811 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2004 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,692 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |