H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Amer Delic H2H: 1-0
Wayne Odesnik holds a 1–0 lead over Amer Delic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2008 Houston third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BIH
Age 44
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Amer Delic | 6-4 7-6(5) | Wayne Odesnik | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2008* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Wayne Odesnik | 6-3 6-3 | Amer Delic | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2007* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Amer Delic | 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Wayne Odesnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amer Delic | #1,041 | #60 | 728 | 1,718 | 25 | 53 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Odesnik | Amer Delic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #447 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #93 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #219 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |