H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Wayne Odesnik holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2008 Roland Garros second round 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Wayne Odesnik | 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wayne Odesnik | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |