H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Igor Kunitsyn H2H: 2-0
Wayne Odesnik holds a 2–0 lead over Igor Kunitsyn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wayne Odesnik leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2009 Indianapolis fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wayne Odesnik | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Wayne Odesnik | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Odesnik | Igor Kunitsyn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |