H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Jurgen Zopp H2H: 1-0
Wayne Odesnik holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Zopp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2012 Kitzbuhel fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
EST
Age 38
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2012* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Wayne Odesnik | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Jurgen Zopp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jurgen Zopp | #1,406 | #71 | 656 | 1,718 | 16 | 31 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Odesnik | Jurgen Zopp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #334 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #329 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #143 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |