H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wayne Odesnik vs Michael Russell H2H: 0-1
Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Odesnik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2010 Memphis third round 0-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2010* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Russell | 0-6 7-5 6-4 | Wayne Odesnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wayne Odesnik | Michael Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |