H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Wayne Odesnik vs Michael Russell H2H: 0-1

Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Wayne Odesnik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2010 Memphis round of 32 0-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wayne Odesnik
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Michael Russell
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Russell #68 0-6 7-5 6-4 Wayne Odesnik #107 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Memphis ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wayne Odesnik #267 #77 984 1,734 40 59 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michael Russell #1,124 #60 693 1,809 77 150 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wayne Odesnik Michael Russell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–3 0.0% #383 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #265 1,451 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #194 1,420 0 0 1998 0–2 0.0% #288 1,473 0 0
21 2007 4–3 57.1% #126 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 13–15 46.4% #119 1,670 0 0 2000 1–6 14.3% #155 1,507 0 0
23 2009 10–13 43.5% #105 1,684 0 0 2001 8–17 32.0% #87 1,573 0 0
24 2010 7–7 50.0% #813 1,704 0 0 2002 5–15 25.0% #157 1,511 0 0
25 2011 0–1 0.0% #129 1,661 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #502 1,530 0 0
26 2012 4–6 40.0% #143 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 2–3 40.0% #138 1,681 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 0–5 0.0% #171 1,628 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #144 1,563 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 10–19 34.5% #82 1,617 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–5 37.5% #242 1,610 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 2–4 33.3% #83 1,636 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 11–23 32.4% #99 1,628 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2011 12–18 40.0% #99 1,748 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2012 11–11 50.0% #87 1,749 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2013 7–15 31.8% #92 1,638 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2014 6–11 35.3% #158 1,582 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #557 1,611 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wayne Odesnik Michael Russell
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 7 11 18 38.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
24 2010 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 0 8 8 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 15 25 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 11 12 23 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 8 14 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 41 63 34.9% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 5 5 0.0% — 55 92 147 37.4% 12 35 47 25.5% 10 23 33 30.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 97/99 of Wayne Odesnik's and 221/227 of Michael Russell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wayne Odesnik Michael Russell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 3/3 7.0 2.0 58.5% 64.4% 41.1% 52.4% 45.6% 55.0% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2/2 4.0 3.0 65.4% 64.6% 63.3% 55.0% 8.3% 64.2% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1/1 19.0 3.0 64.6% 68.8% 51.4% 58.3% 40.0% 62.6% 29.5% 1998 1/2 4.0 4.0 62.7% 65.8% 51.1% 37.5% 30.0% 60.3% 37.7%
21 2007 7/7 9.0 3.3 68.8% 70.3% 53.7% 58.7% 56.6% 65.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 27/28 4.5 2.6 61.2% 67.7% 49.4% 56.6% 40.4% 60.8% 38.4% 2000 6/7 3.8 6.5 61.4% 65.1% 45.0% 50.8% 61.1% 57.3% 37.1%
23 2009 23/23 5.3 2.4 61.1% 66.3% 51.8% 57.7% 36.9% 60.6% 36.8% 2001 23/25 2.4 3.0 68.9% 63.2% 46.6% 46.6% 39.5% 57.9% 38.3%
24 2010 13/14 5.5 3.8 58.3% 68.2% 52.0% 71.2% 44.3% 61.4% 39.4% 2002 18/20 1.9 2.5 69.4% 60.3% 48.8% 54.0% 33.9% 56.8% 37.1%
25 2011 1/1 2.0 2.0 70.0% 50.0% 16.7% 28.6% — 40.0% 20.0% 2003 2/2 1.0 4.5 67.5% 66.0% 49.4% 73.3% 35.4% 60.5% 39.0%
26 2012 10/10 3.7 3.9 59.2% 65.3% 44.2% 58.2% 46.5% 56.5% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 5/5 2.8 1.6 66.7% 61.8% 52.7% 47.3% 41.7% 58.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 5/5 6.0 2.6 60.5% 59.9% 52.9% 51.9% 17.8% 57.6% 29.8% 2006 2/2 1.5 4.0 66.0% 58.1% 43.8% 46.9% 39.6% 53.1% 39.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/29 2.0 2.6 68.1% 65.3% 47.3% 53.1% 44.2% 59.4% 34.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 8/8 3.5 2.8 66.4% 64.4% 51.9% 54.5% 46.5% 60.3% 41.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 1.8 2.7 69.8% 63.9% 51.0% 57.2% 33.1% 59.6% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/34 2.8 3.4 65.1% 63.6% 49.0% 48.2% 39.5% 58.7% 35.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 30/30 2.9 4.2 63.3% 70.0% 47.0% 48.6% 46.5% 61.2% 35.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 22/22 3.0 3.8 63.7% 67.2% 50.5% 46.4% 51.2% 61.0% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 22/22 2.6 2.6 64.2% 65.6% 47.0% 47.6% 40.4% 58.9% 36.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 2.3 3.4 62.5% 64.5% 48.4% 51.8% 39.0% 58.9% 36.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 4.0 7.0 62.7% 54.2% 42.1% 60.9% 23.5% 49.7% 40.2%
Career — 97/99 5.3 2.8 61.5% 66.3% 50.1% 58.0% 39.9% 60.1% 36.5% — 221/227 2.6 3.3 65.7% 65.0% 48.1% 50.0% 42.4% 59.1% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wayne Odesnik Michael Russell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1463 94.9 -0.07 -1.72 0.744 44.7% — — — 22.2% -2.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1452 101.4 +0.34 -0.56 0.877 46.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1421 97.3 -1.63 +0.51 0.791 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 1998 1473 105.5 -1.20 -1.55 0.950 48.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 — — — +0.13
21 2007 1567 118.6 -0.22 -0.70 0.931 48.9% +10 — — 47.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1670 125.5 -2.14 +0.76 0.979 49.4% -43 -14 — 49.3% -0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.67 2000 1507 103.7 -2.23 -1.34 0.871 47.5% — -15 — 33.3% -1.14 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.65
23 2009 1685 131.9 -2.07 +0.91 0.936 48.6% -19 -9 — 40.3% -0.69 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.12 2001 1573 122.4 -1.89 +0.09 0.908 47.9% -32 +20 — 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.46
24 2010 1705 130.0 -1.59 +1.55 1.020 50.9% -53 +3 — 55.9% +0.74 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.09 2002 1512 111.5 -4.18 -0.10 0.860 47.1% +27 -42 +56 30.6% -1.31 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — 0.00
25 2011 1662 102.8 -0.85 -1.17 0.333 30.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.05 2003 1530 108.4 0.00 +2.07 0.988 49.6% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — -0.19
26 2012 1647 117.7 -3.09 -1.64 0.846 46.9% — +67 — 39.3% -0.86 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.14 2004 1548 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1682 126.7 +0.10 -0.21 0.901 48.1% — — — 50.0% -0.57 0–2 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1629 112.5 -2.53 -0.84 0.702 44.2% -11 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.38 2006 1563 110.1 -2.13 -0.63 0.839 46.4% — — — 25.0% -1.00 — 0–1 — -0.01
29 2015 1631 105.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1617 131.4 -2.18 -0.79 0.851 47.4% +33 -140 -127 37.5% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.61
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1610 122.6 -0.43 +2.15 1.039 50.9% +29 — — 40.9% -0.14 1–2 (33%) — — +0.39
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1636 122.0 -2.07 +1.17 0.956 49.0% +31 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1629 131.7 -3.68 -0.27 0.871 47.2% +47 -171 -147 37.2% -0.87 3–7 (30%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1748 137.8 -1.30 -0.31 0.912 48.4% +61 -283 -272 38.0% -0.62 3–2 (60%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1750 129.2 -1.23 -0.23 0.964 49.4% -28 -166 -145 48.3% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1639 129.7 -3.05 -0.32 0.880 47.7% +17 -109 +24 37.5% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1582 133.8 -3.02 -0.10 0.891 47.9% +93 -76 — 41.3% -0.72 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.34
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1611 117.2 +1.80 +0.23 0.798 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14
Career — 1735 127.8 -1.78 +0.29 0.915 48.4% -29 +13 — 42.3% -0.50 21–18 (54%) 20–17 (54%) 105.5 +1.35 — 1810 133.9 -2.37 -0.17 0.897 48.0% +30 -88 -82 38.4% -0.75 23–41 (36%) 35–48 (42%) 91.4 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.