H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Wesley Moodie vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 0-1

Bjorn Phau holds a 1–0 lead over Wesley Moodie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bjorn Phau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bjorn Phau won the 2007 Mumbai round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wesley Moodie
RSA Age 47 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bjorn Phau #153 6-3 2-6 6-4 Wesley Moodie #150 Match data Sep 27, 2007* R32 Mumbai International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wesley Moodie #1,149 #57 664 1,747 47 65 42.0% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wesley Moodie Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,541 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,519 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,578 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 2002 0–1 0.0% #246 1,476 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 2003 7–9 43.8% #82 1,584 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,548 0 0
25 2004 6–16 27.3% #137 1,513 0 0 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,635 0 0
26 2005 16–11 59.3% #63 1,714 0 1 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2006 11–19 36.7% #122 1,667 0 1 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2007 7–9 43.8% #162 1,643 0 1 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,664 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,619 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,610 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,691 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wesley Moodie Bjorn Phau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2003 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2005 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 10 15 25 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2007 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 7 11 36.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 45 79 43.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 56 84 140 40.0% 22 37 59 37.3% 1 13 14 7.1% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wesley Moodie Bjorn Phau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 1.0 4.0 40.0% 65.0% 46.7% 50.0% 0.0% 54.0% 27.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 5/5 1.6 3.4 53.4% 54.5% 54.4% 45.3% 49.6% 54.6% 40.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 4/4 1.8 1.8 52.8% 62.8% 40.8% 51.8% 7.1% 52.3% 31.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 6/6 4.3 4.7 52.5% 63.3% 42.9% 53.9% 45.2% 52.9% 34.4%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 7/7 3.3 3.7 50.6% 64.1% 46.5% 57.5% 53.4% 55.5% 38.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/5 4.2 3.4 51.3% 66.4% 48.3% 40.4% 41.4% 57.3% 34.3%
24 2003 16/16 12.4 3.7 68.7% 73.1% 53.2% 58.0% 36.8% 66.8% 30.5% 2004 9/9 4.9 2.9 53.1% 76.7% 51.5% 55.8% 62.4% 64.6% 43.2%
25 2004 22/22 12.1 3.0 68.4% 75.1% 51.8% 57.9% 29.5% 67.4% 30.1% 2005 24/24 4.4 3.6 52.4% 68.8% 50.4% 55.0% 41.3% 60.2% 37.5%
26 2005 27/27 10.3 2.5 70.3% 73.7% 54.3% 62.3% 41.8% 67.8% 34.6% 2006 42/42 3.4 2.9 51.9% 68.0% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 59.6% 36.1%
27 2006 30/30 10.4 3.2 68.5% 73.4% 49.8% 57.3% 28.8% 65.8% 28.7% 2007 14/14 4.4 4.5 52.7% 66.7% 47.4% 56.2% 35.8% 57.5% 37.3%
28 2007 16/16 9.1 3.1 67.7% 72.1% 50.5% 66.3% 51.0% 65.1% 33.4% 2008 7/7 3.9 3.9 50.2% 70.9% 51.4% 56.7% 30.1% 61.5% 32.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 29/29 3.4 3.5 51.7% 69.1% 50.6% 51.6% 50.1% 60.2% 37.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/22 3.6 4.0 55.2% 69.2% 52.9% 65.0% 39.2% 62.1% 39.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 9/9 2.4 3.6 59.3% 63.5% 43.7% 41.9% 48.6% 55.1% 33.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 21/21 4.6 4.5 52.9% 66.9% 45.4% 55.4% 44.1% 56.9% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 2.9 2.3 53.6% 65.2% 46.5% 35.9% 31.1% 57.5% 32.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 3.0 3.2 54.6% 69.7% 55.1% 58.5% 44.1% 63.0% 39.6%
Career — 111/112 10.8 3.1 68.8% 73.6% 51.9% 60.0% 36.4% 66.6% 31.4% — 218/218 3.7 3.5 52.8% 67.6% 49.4% 53.9% 42.5% 59.0% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wesley Moodie Bjorn Phau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1489 97.1 -0.67 +0.23 0.589 40.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1541 117.3 -2.26 +2.33 0.900 48.3% +18 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1520 113.1 -1.19 -2.11 0.655 41.9% — — — 10.0% -2.90 — — — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1579 109.7 -1.56 -0.62 0.730 44.0% +30 — — 41.2% -1.53 0–2 1–0 — -0.29
22 2001 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1503 105.9 -2.35 -0.97 0.866 47.0% +44 +21 — 25.0% -1.31 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
23 2002 1476 101.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08 2003 1520 108.8 -1.25 -1.61 0.802 46.1% +50 — — 23.1% -1.23 1–1 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
24 2003 1585 113.8 +2.05 -3.39 0.919 48.8% -28 — +66 45.7% -0.37 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 102.5 +0.43 2004 1549 112.6 +0.11 +2.06 1.218 53.5% +29 — — 54.5% +0.64 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
25 2004 1513 117.0 +2.48 -4.03 0.923 48.5% +1 — +53 37.9% -0.76 2–8 (20%) 11–12 (48%) 96.7 -0.05 2005 1636 123.8 -2.04 +0.30 0.941 49.1% +33 -116 -171 45.2% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 97.1 -0.35
26 2005 1714 133.1 +3.49 -1.65 1.074 51.1% -8 — -61 55.0% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 +0.89 2006 1534 119.1 -2.65 -1.24 0.895 47.8% +35 +14 -125 39.0% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 99.5 +2.39
27 2006 1668 130.0 +2.32 -5.69 0.839 47.2% +44 — -68 36.7% -0.77 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 97.8 0.00 2007 1562 125.0 -3.80 +0.33 0.876 47.5% +27 — — 35.1% -0.97 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 +0.14
28 2007 1644 120.3 +1.43 -2.89 0.959 49.4% +20 — +31 48.5% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 94.9 +0.35 2008 1664 123.3 +0.19 -0.03 0.839 47.4% -2 — — 38.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.93
29 2008 1567 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1655 122.5 -2.48 +0.31 0.945 48.9% +37 -87 -225 39.1% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +1.24
30 2009 1548 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1620 123.4 -0.86 +1.49 1.040 50.9% +12 +26 — 39.6% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 95.9 +1.70
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1610 120.1 -4.07 -0.27 0.753 44.3% -4 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.67
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1656 129.8 -3.82 +0.05 0.858 46.9% -5 -6 -210 36.4% -1.29 1–5 (17%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 -0.64
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1642 127.4 -2.35 -2.12 0.765 44.5% +25 — — 26.3% -1.74 1–1 1–1 — -0.28
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1691 122.4 -0.28 +0.27 1.071 51.0% +37 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 — — +0.15
Career — 1747 125.7 +2.47 -3.64 0.940 48.9% +9 — +9 43.5% -0.40 18–20 (47%) 36–43 (46%) 98.9 +1.38 — 1734 127.9 -2.24 -0.06 0.902 48.0% +26 -14 -183 38.2% -0.83 24–34 (41%) 31–41 (43%) 95.8 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.