H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wesley Moodie vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Wesley Moodie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2004 Nottingham third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-4 6-2 | Wesley Moodie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Moodie | #1,149 | #57 | 664 | 1,746 | 47 | 65 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wesley Moodie | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #63 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #162 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |