H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Wesley Moodie vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1
Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Wesley Moodie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2006 Nottingham third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Paul Goldstein | 6-1 7-5 | Wesley Moodie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Moodie | #1,149 | #57 | 664 | 1,746 | 47 | 65 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wesley Moodie | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #63 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #162 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |