H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Wesley Moodie vs Zack Fleishman H2H: 1-0

Wesley Moodie holds a 1–0 lead over Zack Fleishman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wesley Moodie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wesley Moodie won the 2004 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wesley Moodie
RSA Age 47 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Zack Fleishman
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wesley Moodie #143 6-4 6-2 Zack Fleishman #310 Match data Jul 15, 2004* R32 Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wesley Moodie #95 6-3 7-5 Zack Fleishman #240 Match data Aug 26, 2003* Q3 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wesley Moodie #1,149 #57 664 1,747 47 65 42.0% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Zack Fleishman #1,467 #127 337 1,605 7 17 29.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wesley Moodie Zack Fleishman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #460 1,448 0 0
23 2002 0–1 0.0% #246 1,476 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #213 1,480 0 0
24 2003 7–9 43.8% #82 1,584 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #490 1,436 0 0
25 2004 6–16 27.3% #137 1,513 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #238 1,457 0 0
26 2005 16–11 59.3% #63 1,714 0 1 2006 0–3 0.0% #169 1,472 0 0
27 2006 11–19 36.7% #122 1,667 0 1 2007 4–6 40.0% #147 1,578 0 0
28 2007 7–9 43.8% #162 1,643 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #844 1,529 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wesley Moodie Zack Fleishman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2003 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2007 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 45 79 43.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 6 15 21 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Wesley Moodie Zack Fleishman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/1 5.0 4.0 52.9% 77.8% 45.8% 33.3% 0.0% 62.7% 26.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/5 6.2 4.0 56.8% 68.5% 40.3% 62.2% 48.8% 55.9% 39.2%
24 2003 16/16 12.4 3.7 68.7% 73.1% 53.2% 58.0% 36.8% 66.8% 30.5% 2004 2/2 3.5 3.0 57.6% 67.2% 33.6% 47.3% 33.3% 53.0% 26.8%
25 2004 22/22 12.1 3.0 68.4% 75.1% 51.8% 57.9% 29.5% 67.4% 30.1% 2005 2/2 5.5 1.5 62.4% 68.5% 68.3% 40.0% 28.6% 68.4% 28.7%
26 2005 27/27 10.3 2.5 70.3% 73.7% 54.3% 62.3% 41.8% 67.8% 34.6% 2006 3/3 5.7 4.7 49.6% 72.3% 45.4% 53.7% 26.0% 58.6% 29.6%
27 2006 30/30 10.4 3.2 68.5% 73.4% 49.8% 57.3% 28.8% 65.8% 28.7% 2007 10/10 6.3 3.6 53.5% 70.7% 48.7% 55.4% 50.0% 60.6% 28.2%
28 2007 16/16 9.1 3.1 67.7% 72.1% 50.5% 66.3% 51.0% 65.1% 33.4% 2008 1/1 4.0 4.0 54.1% 40.0% 47.1% 20.0% 0.0% 43.2% 27.1%
Career — 111/112 10.8 3.1 68.8% 73.6% 51.9% 60.0% 36.4% 66.6% 31.4% — 24/24 5.8 3.6 54.8% 69.0% 46.7% 52.3% 39.4% 58.7% 30.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wesley Moodie Zack Fleishman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1483 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1449 98.7 -0.19 -2.29 0.721 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
22 2001 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1476 101.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08 2003 1481 105.1 -4.21 -0.35 0.889 48.0% +12 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.51
24 2003 1585 113.8 +2.05 -3.39 0.919 48.8% -28 — +66 45.7% -0.37 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 102.5 +0.43 2004 1437 94.5 -3.25 -0.22 0.569 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.04
25 2004 1513 117.0 +2.48 -4.03 0.923 48.5% +1 — +53 37.9% -0.76 2–8 (20%) 11–12 (48%) 96.7 -0.05 2005 1458 105.5 -0.62 -1.75 0.910 48.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — -0.03
26 2005 1714 133.1 +3.49 -1.65 1.074 51.1% -8 — -61 55.0% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 +0.89 2006 1472 106.7 -1.50 -3.03 0.716 45.5% +3 — — 22.2% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
27 2006 1668 130.0 +2.32 -5.69 0.839 47.2% +44 — -68 36.7% -0.77 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 97.8 0.00 2007 1578 124.1 -1.01 -3.01 0.716 45.4% -23 — — 38.5% -1.00 1–0 4–0 (100%) — -0.71
28 2007 1644 120.3 +1.43 -2.89 0.959 49.4% +20 — +31 48.5% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 94.9 +0.35 2008 1529 94.6 -2.12 -0.94 0.477 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
29 2008 1567 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1506 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1548 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1460 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1747 125.7 +2.47 -3.64 0.940 48.9% +9 — +9 43.5% -0.40 18–20 (47%) 36–43 (46%) 98.9 +1.38 — 1606 110.8 -1.90 -2.00 0.740 45.2% -11 — — 31.7% -1.15 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.