H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Wojtek Fibak vs Mark Cox H2H: 2-2
Wojtek Fibak and Mark Cox are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wojtek Fibak leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1979 Stuttgart Indoor fourth round 7-6 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1979* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wojtek Fibak | 7-6 2-6 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1978* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-2 6-4 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1978* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wojtek Fibak | 6-2 6-3 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1976* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Cox | 7-5 6-3 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wojtek Fibak | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |