H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wojtek Fibak vs Mike Cahill H2H: 1-0
Wojtek Fibak holds a 1–0 lead over Mike Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wojtek Fibak leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1978 Birmingham Wct third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1978* | Birmingham Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 6-2 7-5 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wojtek Fibak | Mike Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |