H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wojtek Fibak vs Tom Okker H2H: 3-2
Wojtek Fibak holds a 3–2 lead over Tom Okker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1978 Boston third round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1978* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Wojtek Fibak | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1977* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wojtek Fibak | 6-2 6-2 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1976* | Stockholm - Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 6-4 7-5 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1976* | Rotterdam Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-1 6-4 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1975* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tom Okker | 7-5 7-5 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wojtek Fibak | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |