H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Xavier Malisse vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 0-1
Arvind Parmar holds a 1–0 lead over Xavier Malisse in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arvind Parmar leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arvind Parmar won the 2004 Nottingham third round 1-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Arvind Parmar | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Xavier Malisse | Match data |
| May 29, 2000 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Xavier Malisse | 6-4 7-5 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Malisse | #1,021 | #19 | 1,410 | 1,895 | 282 | 265 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xavier Malisse | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #161 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #145 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #33 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #112 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #162 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,752 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #63 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #135 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |