H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Yahiya Doumbia vs Libor Pimek H2H: 0-1

Libor Pimek holds a 1–0 lead over Yahiya Doumbia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Libor Pimek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Libor Pimek won the 1988 Nice round of 32 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yahiya Doumbia
SEN Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Libor Pimek
BEL Age 63 Right-Handed 195 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Libor Pimek 6-4 6-0 Yahiya Doumbia Match data Apr 14, 1988* R32 Nice ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yahiya Doumbia #1,312 #74 343 1,627 22 31 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Libor Pimek #1,308 #21 73 1,860 124 119 51.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Libor Pimek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1983 19–14 57.6% #57 1,679 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1984 31–18 63.3% #25 1,765 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1985 25–19 56.8% #34 1,785 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1986 26–25 51.0% #71 1,693 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1987 12–18 40.0% #95 1,659 0 1
24 1988 16–15 51.6% #83 1,611 0 1 1988 10–20 33.3% #234 1,563 0 1
25 1989 0–11 0.0% #389 1,486 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1990 0–1 0.0% #540 1,483 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1991 0–2 0.0% #230 1,455 0 1 1991 1–4 20.0% #332 1,531 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #742 1,517 0 1
29 1993 1–1 50.0% #397 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1995 5–0 100.0% #142 1,580 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 0–1 0.0% #429 1,559 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Libor Pimek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 13 8 21 61.9% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1989 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 15 30 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — 35 33 68 51.5% 74 63 137 54.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 21 36 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 10/10 of Yahiya Doumbia's and 5/6 of Libor Pimek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Libor Pimek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 2/2 7.0 2.5 54.4% 68.7% 56.0% 43.3% 36.1% 63.2% 33.9% 1991 4/5 1.5 6.8 56.9% 67.4% 40.7% 39.3% 38.9% 55.9% 39.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 0.0 7.0 54.4% 48.4% 42.3% 28.6% 33.3% 45.6% 35.3%
29 1993 2/2 5.0 7.0 50.3% 76.5% 53.9% 73.8% 33.3% 65.4% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5/5 3.8 1.0 60.5% 72.2% 53.7% 75.0% 58.9% 64.7% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1/1 1.0 8.0 45.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 23.1% 46.7% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10/53 4.4 3.2 55.7% 71.4% 52.2% 65.9% 45.6% 62.7% 41.3% — 5/243 1.2 6.8 56.4% 63.6% 41.0% 37.1% 37.8% 53.8% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yahiya Doumbia Libor Pimek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1680 144.4 — — — — -76 +43 — 53.7% +0.38 6–4 (60%) 0–2 — +0.95
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1766 147.4 — — — — -132 +110 — 58.2% +0.51 7–3 (70%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.14
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1786 142.2 — — — — -63 +23 — 54.2% +0.26 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.15
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1694 123.8 — — — — -33 +69 — 47.5% -0.46 10–4 (71%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.70
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1660 122.6 — — — — +56 -51 — 43.1% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.05
24 1988 1611 132.2 — — — — +75 -127 — 50.0% +0.08 6–5 (55%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.42 1988 1564 116.7 — — — — +89 -31 — 33.3% -1.07 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.74
25 1989 1487 104.0 — — — — +41 — — 11.1% -2.44 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 1484 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1456 98.2 -1.37 -1.98 0.922 48.2% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–1 — +0.15 1991 1531 106.0 -0.47 -0.21 0.902 47.9% +81 — — 27.3% -1.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.28
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1518 97.8 +0.55 -1.38 0.649 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
29 1993 1473 108.7 -0.76 +0.86 1.027 51.3% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1580 121.7 -0.73 +3.00 1.323 56.0% +30 — — 100.0% +3.10 — — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1559 97.8 -0.20 -0.05 0.750 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1628 125.9 -0.81 +1.27 1.107 52.2% +61 -127 — 43.8% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) 97.2 +3.15 — 1861 138.4 -0.27 -0.44 0.842 46.5% -26 +43 — 48.7% -0.17 41–26 (61%) 24–20 (55%) 109.7 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.