H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 1-0
Yannick Hanfmann holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Hanfmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Hanfmann won the 2017 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2023 | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Facundo Bagnis | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Yannick Hanfmann | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |