H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Federico Delbonis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yannick Hanfmann vs Federico Delbonis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |