H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-0
Yannick Hanfmann holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Hanfmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Hanfmann won the 2018 Munich third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2018* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Yannick Hanfmann | 6-2 6-4 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |