H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Paul-Henri Mathieu
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yannick Hanfmann vs Paul-Henri Mathieu.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |